Let me explain what I mean. I've used the analogy of building a
brick wall to describe the process of writing a story before, but
let's take the same process and use a different description. When I
write, I want to have a cohesive whole when I'm done. I want
something that my wife can hand to a co-worker and say, 'Read this.'
When that stranger is done, they should have a clear picture in their
heads. One image. People can interpret it in all the different ways
that they want (and that's one of the ways you can tell the goods
ones, in my opinion), but they will agree that they see the same
thing.
The irony is, that one image is put together from hundreds of smaller
images. In your average work of fiction, most of the major
characters are assembled from traits lifted from parents, friends,
and people who once sat next to the author on the bus. If a location
like a park or a house only has a minor part in our story, we can
import it from real life. If we're going to do something unwholesome
with it, like have the little old lady character stop there to check
her map and see a gaunt, withered woman walk toward her, dragging her
long hair on the ground and leaving a wet, bloody trail, well then
maybe we should make up our own location. Or pick a real one and
modify it (change the little pieces that make up the big piece) so
much that its unrecognizable.
Now if I take these pieces:
An old Twilight Zone episode, The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street.
A sound bite from a segment of This American Life, describing how a
family deals with a grandmother's progressing Alzheimer’s.
News story after news story about young, growing boys and girls
walking away from their families and lives to join Islamic State.
My experience tonight walking the dog. Seeing darkened houses and
empty streets. Everything was silent, except for the music coming
from one house at the end of a cul de sac; a light, carefree tune
from the forties. Something to dance to in a wholesome, innocent
manner, imagining that all your troubles are over and that no new
ones will ever arrive.
I can mix them up and around in my head and see how they might fit
together. Does the grandmother listen to the music, or does she keep
asking where her favorite grandson is? Are things as cozy and
friendly on Maple Street as they seem, or has our grandmother started
spilling some of the embarrassing secrets that she's collected over
her long life?
Now, you and I both have that same set of pieces, but here's the
trick. They won't fit together for you the same way that they will
for me. I've given you a couple of examples of how they fit in my
head, but how would you have assembled them on your own? What are
the odds that you would have come up with those specific pairings?
Even assuming you and I both write horror, if piece A fits with piece
B for me, you'll put A with C, and I'll ask you where the hell you
got that connection point on C because I didn't see it until you
showed me. We're all our own machines, churning out our own results
no matter if you input the same data into two of us, or two thousand.
Now this is not going to hold up as an excuse to plagiarize someone's
finished product, believe me. There are the writer's equivalents of
brush strokes, as well as people's ability to pick up the intent and
the feeling of a piece of writing, good or bad. That's not even
taking into account the patterns that any decent search program can
find. Get your own pieces, and write your own puzzle.
That's what I'm going to do, get back to writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment