Hey there! Good to see you again. Let me introduce you to a couple
of people. This is Dale. He works out at the beef-packing plant as
the loading dock supervisor. He's been working at that place for
over thirty years, at first to support his mother and sister, and
then later his wife and son. He's not quite as content with that
fact as he used to be.
And this is Frank, a deputy with the local sheriff's office. Back
when he first joined the department, one seriously evil SOB was
running it. But he stuck to his guns, even though it cost him his
marriage. Now he wants to be sheriff.
Whats going to happen to them? Well, that depends on you and me.
It may seem counter-intuitive, but it's more important that you know
your characters during the rewrite than when writing the first draft.
On your first trip through the story, you're seeing the big picture,
and making sure the ground under your feet is solid. The characters
are there to prop up the plot. Whereas you and I (unless the Rutan
are reading this) get our structural support from our skeletons,
these folks start with what they contribute to our tale. If you took
a close look at them the first time they get mentioned, they would
probably look like wax statues, not even shaped into good detail on
the back. They don't have any life of their own at that point.
On the second pass, they need more life. We're not just appreciating
the scenery at that point, we're taking note of how clear the path
is, whether the plants look green or brown, and if the area smells
like rainforest or store-bought fertilizer. Assuming you're writing
something that you want people to read, you better make it a
worthwhile investment of their time. If you say the mailman did it
on page 483, say it was done with a knife on page 101, and say the
mailman faints at the sight of blood on page 257, someone's going to
notice. Heck, some people will notice if you misspell one word out
of a hundred thousand. People are like that. (See an older entry
about writing or filming crap)
What will they do if you get it wrong? Depends. If you're Stephen
King, and you put an electric chair in a novel set a few years before
they were actually used, every amateur critic and rabid fan in the
civilized world will take to the internet and froth at the mouth over
it, and it won't affect your sales one bit. If, on the other hand,
you're an unknown, and you write 'cleaver' when you mean 'clever,' or
worse, you miss-type it and your autocorrect changes it to the
former, the editor may well throw your story in the trash, and you'll
only get a form letter with 'not what we're looking for at this time'
pre-printed on it.
So think about those characters. Wait until you have the story set
in your head and the frame of it on paper first, but try this thought
in particular: What would they do if you didn't use them as
cannon-fodder? If the martians didn't land, or the dead stayed
content and quiet in their graves, or that little piece of a deadly
crystal didn't show up at just the right time, what would those
people do on what would otherwise be the opening day of your story?
As far as the two men you met a few paragraphs ago, Dale would get a
little more bitter, just as he did yesterday, and the day before
that. His birthday's coming up, you see, and he hasn't lived quite
as much as he expected he would have at his age. What about Frank?
Well, I told you he wants to be sheriff. I might have glossed over
the fact that he's already run once, and that he actually held the
office for a short while under less than ideal circumstances. He
already has a firm picture in his head about how the people in town
feel about him, and he tends to ignore anything that contradicts that
image. Frank won't be disillusioned any time in the immediate
future. He'll just go about his business, being wrong about some
very fundamental facts.
But of course, we know what's really going to happen. We've known
all along. But also knowing what they might do if they existed
without us lets us plot their actions a little more consistently, and
it makes them a little more sympathetic to us, which helps us make
them more sympathetic to everyone else.
Speaking of which, could I ask for a bit of sympathy? I went through
all that chest-puffing last week about how The Red Man Burning was
going to be my next book, but between then and now I pulled up that
other one I mentioned, In The Dark, and used the word count function.
It pulls up at around 43,000 words. At that length I might as well
fatten it up and serve it with some flourish. Dress warmly if you
read it. It's a bit cold out there in the dark.
Still writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment